Algebra general exam. January 13th 2012, 9am-2pm

Directions.

Problem 1

  1. Let F=𝔽qF=\mathbb{F}_{q} be a finite field, where q=prq=p^{r} is a power of a prime pp. Let G=GLn(F)G=G L_{n}(F) be the group of all n×nn \times n invertible matrices with entries in FF. Once you pick an ordered basis of V:=FnV:=F^{n}, you may find it useful to identify GG with the group of invertible linear operators on VV.
    (a) ( 6 pts) Calculate the order of GG. Explain your answer carefully and write it in the simplest form as you can.
    (b) ( 3 pts) Determine the order of a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG, and explicitly exhibit a Sylow pp-subgroup UU of GG.
    (c) ( 2 pts) What is the normalizer in GG of the Sylow pp-subgroup UU that you exhibited in (b)? An answer is sufficient.
    (d) ( 3 pts) How many Sylow pp-subgroups of GG are there? Explain how your answer in (d) is consistent with Sylow’s theorem.

Problem 2

  1. Let GG be a subgroup of the symmetric group SnS_{n} for some integer n>1n>1. Assume that GG acts transitively on 𝐧:={1,2,,n}\mathbf{n}:=\{1,2, \cdots, n\}, that is, for any i,j𝐧i, j \in \mathbf{n} there exists gGg \in G s.t. g(i)=jg(i)=j.

A partition of 𝐧\mathbf{n} is a decomposition 𝐧=X1Xm\mathbf{n}=X_{1} \cup \cdots \cup X_{m} into a disjoint union of nonempty subsets. There are two trivial partitions: 𝐧=𝐧\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{n} and 𝐧=X1Xn\mathbf{n}=X_{1} \cup \cdots \cup X_{n} (so each XiX_{i} has just one element). Otherwise the partition is said to be nontrivial. The group GG is called imprimitive if there is a nontrivial partition 𝐧=X1Xm\mathbf{n}=X_{1} \cup \cdots \cup X_{m} such that, for gGg \in G and 1im1 \leq i \leq m, g(Xi)=Xjg\left(X_{i}\right)=X_{j} for some jj. (That is, GG permutes the partition members among themselves.) The set {Xi}\left\{X_{i}\right\} is called a system of imprimitivity for the action of GG on 𝐧\mathbf{n}. The group GG is called primitive if it is not imprimitive.
(a) ( 3 pts) Let n=6n=6 and consider the cyclic subgroup G:=(1,2,3,4,5,6)G:=\langle(1,2,3,4,5,6)\rangle of S6S_{6}. There are two non-trivial systems of imprimitivity for the action of GG on 𝐧\mathbf{n}. Find them.
(b) ( 3 pts) Prove that if X1XmX_{1} \cup \cdots \cup X_{m} is a system of imprimitivity for the action of GG on 𝐧\mathbf{n}, then all subsets XiX_{i} have the same size n/mn / m.
(c) ( 4 pts) GG is said to be doubly transitive if given elements a,b,c,d𝐧a, b, c, d \in \mathbf{n}, with aba \neq b and cdc \neq d, there exists gGg \in G such that g(a)=cg(a)=c and g(b)=dg(b)=d. Show that a doubly transitive group GG is primitive.
(d) ( 4 pts ) Show that if n3n \geq 3, the alternating subgroup G=AnG=A_{n} of SnS_{n} is primitive.

Problem 3

Let R=[2]R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-2}].
(a) ( 7 pts) Prove that RR is a Euclidean domain. Hint: Use the square of the usual complex norm.
(b) ( 8 pts ) Write 7 and 11 as products of irreducible elements of RR. Justify your answer.

Problem 4

Let RR be a ring with 1 . The opposite ring RopR^{o p} is defined as follows: as a set Rop=RR^{o p}=R, the addition on RopR^{o p} coincides with the addition on RR and the multiplication * on RopR^{o p} is the multiplication on RR in reverse order, that is, a*b=baa * b=b a (where bab a is the product in RR ). Let eRe \in R be an idempotent element, that is, e2=ee^{2}=e.
(a) (2 pts) Prove that eRe={e R e=\{ ere :rR}: r \in R\} is a subring of RR.
(b) ( 6 pts) Consider the left RR-module M=ReM=R e. Prove that its endomorphism ring EndR(M)=HomR(M,M)E n d_{R}(M)=H o m_{R}(M, M) is isomorphic to (eRe)op(e R e)^{o p}, the opposite ring of eRee R e.

Problem 5

(9 pts) Let FF be a field, nn a positive integer and Mn(F)M_{n}(F) the set of n×nn \times n matrices over FF. Let AMatn(F)A \in \operatorname{Mat}_{n}(F) be such that A2=AA^{2}=A. Prove that AA is diagonalizable and classify all such AA up to similarity. (Recall that A,BMatn(F)A, B \in \operatorname{Mat}_{n}(F) are similar if there exists CGLn(F)C \in G L_{n}(F) s.t. C1AC=BC^{-1} A C=B.)

Problem 6

Let RR be a commutative ring with 1 . Recall that a left RR-module MM is called Noetherian if it satisfies the ascending chain condition on submodules and Artinian if it satisfies the descending chain condition on submodules. Assume that an RR-module MM is both Artinian and Noetherian. (For example, RR might be a field, and MM might be a finite-dimensional vector space over RR ). Let T:MMT: M \rightarrow M be an RR-module homomorphism.
(a) ( 3 pts) Prove that there exists kk \in \mathbb{N} s.t. Ker(Tk)=Ker(T2k)\operatorname{Ker}\left(T^{k}\right)=\operatorname{Ker}\left(T^{2 k}\right) and Im(Tk)=Im(T2k)\operatorname{Im}\left(T^{k}\right)=\operatorname{Im}\left(T^{2 k}\right).
(b) ( 4 pts) Prove that if kk is as in part (a), then M=Ker(Tk)Im(Tk)M=\operatorname{Ker}\left(T^{k}\right) \oplus \operatorname{Im}\left(T^{k}\right)
(c) ( 2 pts) Deduce from (a) and (b) that there exist submodules M0M_{0} and M1M_{1} of MM s.t. M=M0M1,TM0M=M_{0} \oplus M_{1}, T_{\mid M_{0}} is nilpotent and TM1T_{\mid M_{1}} is invertible (as a map from M1M_{1} to M1M_{1} ).
(d) ( 5 pts) Now assume that RR is a field of characteristic zero, MM is a finite-dimensional vector space over RR and tr(Tn)=0\operatorname{tr}\left(T^{n}\right)=0 for every n>0n \in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}. Prove that TT is nilpotent. Hint: Apply (c), assume that M10M_{1} \neq 0 and reach a contradiction by applying the Cayley-Hamilton theorem to TM1T_{\mid M_{1}}.

Problem 7

If qq is a prime power, denote by 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q} a finite field of order qq.
(a) ( 6 pts) Find a monic irreducible polynomial of degree 3 over 𝔽5\mathbb{F}_{5} and use it to construct a field of order 125 . Justify your answer.
(b) ( 6 pts) Find all qq for which the polynomial p(x)=x2+x+1p(x)=x^{2}+x+1 is irreducible in 𝔽q[x]\mathbb{F}_{q}[x]. Hint: What can you say about roots of p(x)p(x) and what do you know about the multiplicative group 𝔽q×\mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times}?

Problem 8

Let FF be a field of characteristic zero, let KK and LL be finite extensions of FF and KLK L the compositum of KK and LL.
(a) (4 pts) Prove that [KL:F][K:F][L:F][K L: F] \leq[K: F] \cdot[L: F].
(b) (2 pts) Assume that [K:F][K: F] and [L:F][L: F] are relatively prime. Prove that [KL:F]=[K:F][L:F][K L: F]=[K: F][L: F].
(c) (4 pts) Give an example where KL=FK \cap L=F but [KL:F][K[K L: F] \neq[K : F][L:F]F][L: F].
(d) (4 pts) Assume that K/FK / F and L/FL / F are both Galois. Prove that Gal(KL/F)\operatorname{Gal}(K L / F) is isomorphic to a subgroup of Gal(K/F)×Gal(L/F)\operatorname{Gal}(K / F) \times \operatorname{Gal}(L / F). (You need not prove that KL/FK L / F is Galois).
Note: The assertions of (a),(b) and (d) remain valid for FF of positive characteristic, but part (a) has shorter proof in the case of characteristic zero.